Menu
glossarnew

ARM vs. x86: The Battle of Architectures. Why x86 Is Still King for High-Load Projects, and Who Needs ARM in 2025?

A Tectonic Shift in the Data Center Foundation

Ten or fifteen years ago, the question “Which processor architecture should I choose for my server?” would have sounded absurd in professional circles. In fact, the answer was obvious, devoid of alternatives, and practically carved in silicon: x86. The duopoly of Intel and AMD reigned supreme over the corporate computing and hosting market. At that time, ARM architecture was associated exclusively with smartphones, tablets, routers, and low-power IoT (Internet of Things) devices. Furthermore, it was considered axiomatic that ARM chips were great for saving battery life but simply “couldn’t handle” serious server workloads like databases or virtualization.

However, in the 2020s, the rules of the game changed forever. First, Apple upended the consumer electronics industry by releasing the M1 chip, visibly proving that ARM architecture could be faster, cooler, and more efficient than top-tier Intel solutions in laptops. Subsequently, this signal was heard loud and clear in data centers. Hyperscalers like AWS (with Graviton processors), Google, and Oracle began a mass migration of their cloud infrastructures to ARM. Additionally, specialized server monsters like Ampere Altra emerged, offering 80, 128, and even 192 cores per single socket.

Consequently, today system administrators, CTOs, and IT business owners face a real, economically driven dilemma: should one migrate to ARM for the sake of energy efficiency and hype, or is it better to stick with the powerful x86 architecture, proven over decades?

In this article, the Unihost team will conduct a deep technical analysis, avoiding marketing clichés. We will explain the difference between RISC and CISC at the instruction level, compare performance in real-world cases (from web hosting to game servers), and help you understand which architecture is better suited for your specific tasks in 2025.

Part 1. Under the Hood: Fundamental Differences Between RISC and CISC

To understand the essence of the dispute, one must descend from the operating system level to the “hardware” level and code execution logic. Fundamentally, at the core of the battle lie two different computing philosophies established back in the 1980s.

x86: The CISC Philosophy (Complex Instruction Set Computing)

This is the architecture used by Intel (Core, Xeon) and AMD (Ryzen, EPYC).

  • The Essence: The processor is capable of executing complex, multi-part instructions in a single clock cycle. For instance, a single assembly command can force the processor to load a number from memory, add it to a number in a register, and write the result back to memory.
  • Hardware Complexity: For the processor to “understand” a complex instruction, a highly complex block-the decoder-operates inside the chip. Specifically, it breaks down complex commands into micro-operations (uOps). Unfortunately, this decoder takes up space on the die and consumes energy.
  • Advantages: High code density (the program takes up less space in RAM), immense raw power, and the ability to solve heavy mathematical tasks with fewer commands.

ARM: The RISC Philosophy (Reduced Instruction Set Computing)

In contrast, this architecture is used in mobile chips, Apple Silicon, and Ampere servers.

  • The Essence: The processor operates with a set of very simple, primitive instructions of fixed length. A complex task is broken down by the compiler into many small steps: “Load,” “Add,” “Store.” This is known as Load/Store architecture.
  • Hardware Simplicity: Instruction decoders are very simple. Therefore, this frees up space on the silicon die to place more computing cores or cache memory.
  • Advantages: Simple instructions require fewer transistors to execute. The immediate consequence is phenomenal energy efficiency.
  • Evolution: Previously, it was believed that RISC was slower. But modern ARM chips have learned to execute these simple instructions with incredible speed, parallelism, and branch prediction, catching up with x86 in most scenarios.

Part 2. Why Is ARM Taking Over the Cloud World?

The growth of ARM’s popularity in the server segment (especially in public clouds) is driven not by fashion, but by dry economics and the physics of data centers.

Energy Efficiency and the “Dark Silicon” Problem

Modern x86 chips have hit a thermal ceiling. Basically, you cannot simply add more Intel Xeon cores without turning the server into a space heater.
ARM solves this problem efficiently. A server-grade ARM processor (e.g., Ampere Altra) consumes 20–40% less energy than an x86 equivalent in performance at 100% load.
For a data center, this results in a Double Win:

  • Firstly, electricity bills for powering the server itself decrease significantly.
  • Secondly, costs for air conditioning drop because the server generates less heat.
    Ultimately, at the scale of thousands of racks, this amounts to millions of dollars in savings per year, allowing cloud providers to lower instance prices.

Core Density

Moreover, thanks to the simplified architecture (absence of complex decoders), manufacturers can place more physical cores on a single silicon die of the same area. While top-tier Intel/AMD chips offer 64–96 cores, ARM solutions have already stepped beyond 128–192 physical cores per socket.
Thus, for tasks that parallelize perfectly (horizontal scaling), ARM provides better computing density per square meter of rack space.

Predictable Performance

Finally, many server ARM processors run at a fixed frequency (e.g., 3.0 GHz) without aggressive Turbo Boost. This means your server’s performance will be the same day and night, regardless of the hall temperature or the load on neighboring cores (“Noisy Neighbors”).

Part 3. The Counterstrike: Why x86 (Intel/AMD) Is Not Going to Die

Reading the chapter above, one might think that the days of Intel Core and AMD Ryzen are numbered. But this is far from the truth. In the High Performance Computing (HPC), gaming, and specific workload segments that Unihost specializes in, the x86 architecture remains the unrivaled leader. Here is why.

Single Thread Performance

This is the “Achilles’ heel” of server ARM processors. They win on the quantity of cores, not the quality of each individual core.
Conversely, Unihost flagships-Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-are capable of boosting up to 5.7–6.0 GHz. Server ARM chips are usually limited to frequencies of 3.0–3.3 GHz.

  • Why This Is Important: Game servers (Minecraft, CS2, Rust), many databases (MySQL), blockchain nodes (Solana), and High-Frequency Trading (HFT) systems critically depend on the speed of one main thread. If one core works slowly, the remaining 127 cores will sit idle. In this case, x86 wins by a landslide.

Vector Instruction Sets (AVX-512)

Additionally, x86 processors support powerful SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) instruction sets, such as AVX-512. They allow processing huge arrays of data in a single processor clock cycle.
This is critical for:

  • Scientific computing and modeling.
  • Video encoding and decoding (transcoding).
  • Cryptography (Zero-Knowledge Proofs).
  • Neural network training (AI Inference).
    ARM has its counterpart (SVE/SVE2), however, its support in software still lags significantly behind the AVX ecosystem.

Ecosystem and Compatibility (The “Legacy” Factor)

Yes, Linux runs great on ARM. But in the world of enterprise software, there are thousands of proprietary applications compiled only for x86_64.

  • To illustrate, if you use closed-source banking software, older database versions, or specific control panels, switching to ARM is impossible without emulation.
  • Furthermore, emulation (translating x86 code to ARM on the fly) always leads to a 20-40% performance loss and unpredictable bugs.
  • Windows Server: Although Microsoft released a version for ARM, support for third-party drivers and applications there is still at an embryonic stage compared to the x86 world.

Part 4. Battle in Real Conditions: Use Cases

The Unihost team has prepared a detailed comparison for different workload types.

Game Servers (Minecraft, CS2, ARK)

This is one of the most popular request categories at Unihost.

  • Specifics: The Game Loop of most games executes in one main thread. Consequently, this thread must calculate physics, player positioning, and world logic within 50ms (for 20 TPS).
  • ARM: A frequency of 3.0 GHz is insufficient. The server will start “lagging” with just 20-30 players.
  • x86 (i9/Ryzen): A frequency of 5.8 GHz allows processing complex worlds and hundreds of players without TPS drops.
  • Verdict: Only x86. ARM is useless here.

Web Servers and Microservices

  • Specifics: Nginx, Apache, PHP-FPM, Node.js, Python, Go. Thousands of small, independent requests.
  • ARM: An ideal environment. You can run hundreds of Docker containers on a single processor with 128 cores. Excellent energy efficiency.
  • x86: On the other hand, x86 also handles this perfectly well but may consume more power.
  • Verdict: Draw / ARM Wins (if electricity price is paramount). However, x86 often wins due to higher peak performance per request (lower latency).

Virtualization and VPS Hosting

  • Specifics: Running multiple virtual machines (VMs) on a single host.
  • The ARM Problem: You can run only ARM-architecture guest OSs (Linux aarch64) on an ARM server. You cannot run Windows Server x86 or an older Linux distro without slow emulation.
  • The x86 Advantage: Complete universality. You can run any OS: Windows, Linux, BSD, Solaris.
  • Verdict: Therefore, x86 remains the standard for general-purpose VPS providers like Unihost for the sake of compatibility.

AI and Machine Learning

  • Specifics: Model training.
  • Reality: GPUs (NVIDIA graphics cards) rule here. The Central Processing Unit (CPU) plays the role of a “conductor,” preparing data for the video card.
  • Verdict: The NVIDIA driver ecosystem (CUDA) for x86 has been polished for years. Support for ARM in the server AI segment appeared recently (with Grace Hopper chips), but for the mass market, the x86 CPU + NVIDIA GPU combination remains the most reliable and bug-free.

Part 5. Software Ecosystem: Is the Software Ready?

One of the main fears when switching is “Will it compile?” In 2025, the situation has improved dramatically, yet pitfalls remain.

  • OS: Ubuntu, Debian, AlmaLinux, and Rocky Linux have fully stable aarch64 releases.
  • Languages: Python, PHP, Java, Go, Rust, and Node.js offer full native support.
  • Databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, Redis, MongoDB, and ClickHouse work excellently on ARM. Sometimes, they are even faster than on x86 (due to ARM’s weak memory consistency model, which requires care but offers speed).
  • Control Panels: cPanel, Plesk, and DirectAdmin have declared ARM support. However, many plugins and extensions (especially proprietary antiviruses or backup systems) may not work properly.

Part 6. Future: A Hybrid World and the x86 Response

The industry does not stand still. Seeing ARM’s success, x86 giants began to adapt.
Accordingly, Intel introduced a hybrid architecture (starting with the 12th generation, Alder Lake): combining powerful P-cores (Performance) and energy-efficient E-cores (Efficient) on a single die.
This is an attempt to take the best of both worlds:

  • P-cores provide 5.8 GHz frequency for games and heavy tasks (like in the good old x86).
  • E-cores take up little space and handle background tasks, saving energy (like in ARM).
    Notably, these are exactly the processors (Intel Core i9-13900K / 14900K) we use at Unihost, offering clients a compromise that works today.

Unihost: Your Infrastructure Without Limits

At Unihost, we closely monitor trends and test ARM servers in labs, but we do not succumb to blind marketing hype. Our mission is to provide clients with the hardware that solves their tasks most effectively and reliably right now.

Why We Choose x86

Today, for the profile of tasks our clients face-high-load projects, game servers, financial gateways, blockchain nodes, and universal virtualization-the x86 architecture (Intel Core i9, Xeon, AMD Ryzen, EPYC) remains the absolute benchmark.

That is why we bet on flagship processors of the latest generations:

  1. AMD Ryzen 9 7950X / 9950X: Multithreading monsters. 16 cores / 32 threads, frequency up to 5.7 GHz, AVX-512 support. Ideal for crypto nodes, code compilation, and virtualization.
  2. Intel Core i9-13900K / 14900K: Frequency kings. Overclocking up to 6.0 GHz. The best choice for game servers, real-time databases, and trading.
  3. GPU Servers: Powerful x86 hosts with NVIDIA cards for Artificial Intelligence and rendering tasks where driver stability is essential.

Final Thoughts

We understand that every project is unique. Switching to a new architecture is a risk. Moreover, staying on an old one when it is inefficient is a loss of money.

Doubt your choice?
Don’t read tea leaves. Write to the Unihost support chat. Our engineers will analyze your technology stack (OS, software, load character) and honestly tell you: will you save by switching, or is it better to take a proven powerful Ryzen?

Ultimately, we don’t sell architectures. We sell performance for your business.

Find Your Perfect Server at Unihost